Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Work Enggamenent (Keterlibatan Kerja), Kinerja Terhadap Quality Of Worklife (Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja) Guru, Pada Yayasan Pendidikan Karya Bahana Mandiri
Keywords:
Organizational Culture, Work Engagement, Quality of Work LifeAbstract
The quality of education is determined by the quality of teachers' work life as the main educators in schools. Some factors that affect the quality of teachers' work life include organizational culture, work engagement, and teacher performance. This study aims to determine the effect of organizational culture, work involvement, performance on the quality of work life of vocational teachers at Karya Bahana Mandiri Education Foundation. The research approach used is a quantitative approach, using measuring instruments in the form of an organizational culture scale, work engagement scale, performance scale, and quality of work life scale. The population of this study was 103 teachers of Karya Bahana Mandiri Education Foundation. From the total population the researcher took a sample of 51 respondents. Sampling was determined using the Krejcie-Mogran table. The data collection process uses a Likert scale, while data analysis uses Cronbach's Alpha with the help of the SPSS for Windows version 26 program.
The results of the t test the t value of 10.954 is greater than> t table 2.010, so it can be concluded that HO is rejected and H1 is accepted, which means that partially states "There is a significant influence between X1 on Y, this can be seen from the significant value of X1, namely : 0.000 is smaller than 0.05. The significant value of X2 has a significant effect on Y, the significant value of X1 is: 0.000 is smaller than 0.05. partially states "there is a significant influence between X3 on Y and based on the Significant value, the significant value of X3 has no significant effect on Y, the significant value of X1 is : 0.818 is greater. Based on the F test results, it shows that the calculated F value of = 233.512 is greater than the F table value of 2.800. Then the calculated F value is greater than the F table value: (233.512> 2.800), so based on decision making in the f test it can be concluded that the hypothesis is accepted. Organizational Culture, Work Engagement, Performance affect the Quality of Work Life of Vocational Teachers at Karya Bahana Mandiri Education Foundation. The hypothesis proposed by the researcher can be concluded that the hypothesis simultaneously (together) affects Y (Quality of Work Life).
Downloads
References
Amin, Z. (2013). Quality of Work Life in Indonesian Public Service Organizations: The Role of Career Development and Personal Factors. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(3), 38–44.
Andrews, F., & Withey, S. (1974). Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys. Social Indicators Research, 1, 1–26.
Aryansyah, I., & Kusumaputri, E. (2013). Iklim Organisasi dan Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja Karyawan. Humanitas, 10(1), 75–86.
Bogdan, R. C., & Sari, K. B. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education, An Introduction to Theory and Method. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Johnson, J.C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage PublicationsDjamarah. 2000. Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chatab, N. 2007. Profil Budaya Organisasi. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Cole D.C, Robson, L.S., Lemieux-Charles, L., McGuire, W., Sicotte, W & Champagn, F., Quality of working life indicators in Canadian health care organizations: a tool for healthy, health care workplaces?. Occupational Medicine, 2005, (55), 54–59. [4].
Cresswel, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and researche design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. California: Sage Pub. Inc
Depdikbud. 1997. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Dewi, M. P., & Firman. (2019). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3)
Efendi, N. M. (2019). Revolusi pembelajaran berbasis digital (penggunaan animasi digital pada start up sebagai metode pembelajaran siswa belajar aktif). Habitus: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosiologi, & Antropologi, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/habitus.v2i2.28788
Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Hadari, Nawawi. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Bisnis dan Kompetitif cetakan ke- 1 Gajah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Lukum, A. (2019). Pendidikan 4.0 di era generasi z: tantangan dan solusinya. Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Gorontalo, Indonesia, 2.
Moleong, L.J. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Peter Fisk, “Education 4.0 the Future of Learning Will Be Dramatically Different, in School and throughout Life,” last modified 2017, accessed Nov 1, 2022, http://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/.
Poerwandari, E.K. (2005). Pendekatan Kualitatif untuk penelitian perilaku manusia. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan pendidikan Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia
Pranaja, A., & Astuti, Y. (2019). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3).
Priyatno, Duwi. 2008. Mandiri Belajar SPSS Statistic Product and Service Solution. Mediacom. Yogyakarta.
Purwanto, M.N. 2009. Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Roestiyah. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Rosenbaum, P. (1998). Quality of Life. http://www.canchild.co/Default.aspx?tabid=126, diunduh tanggal 9 Agustus 2014
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT. Alfabet
Sutrisno. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Kencana, Jakarta.
Undang-undang No. 20 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Tahun 2003
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005. Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: PB PGRI, 2006.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 STIE Mulia Pratama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.